NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Worth using either way (Score:1)
I don't think git is going to magically draw more contributors to a project, but it certainly does make the lives of everyone involved with the project easier.
Even if you end up with the same number of contributions when compared to svn, I still think git is worth the switch. Being able to add a remote repository and cherry-pick a specific patch, or merge a branch in a matter of minutes is great. I don't maintain any popular projects, but for the few that I do get contributions [github.com], it has made my job much quic
Re: (Score:2)
That's my view so far, qualitative and as best I can quantitative*, based this project that converted to git [perl.org].
So I think that Adam's hypothesis that a conversion to git doesn't materially change the contributor profile seems to remain unchallenged.
* I'm not a statistician, and the data that I extract seems to have a lot of variation, so I'm not comfor
Re:Worth using either way (Score:1)
We have learned from the discipline of program optimisation that removing the major bottleneck just reveals the next, and what these people are actually saying is “Perforce was the first thing I ran into that discouraged me beyond my motivation threshold”. Progress exists, though, regardless of whether silver bullets do.
Reply to This
Parent