NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I don't get it (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it (Score:2)
Hi!
I don't really understand why there's such a big difference between them. I was suggesting a good idea for a grant, and if someone is interested on hacking on the module even without the money, then I'll be fully supportive of him.
Note that if no one volunteers (or receives a gr
Re:I don't get it (Score:2)
They are two distinct phases of the process. Who knows: maybe you'll find someone to do the work who does not want or need a grant (like almost every other project on the CPAN).
But the entire purpose of the grant is to make other people involved in hacking my code. From my experience, such people can often give a new perspective on its development and come with many good ideas and code for further development.
From my experience, it's
Licensing Issue (Score:1)
The Distributions says that it is licensed under the BSD license [0] however the individual files are licensed under MIT [1]
0. http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Widgets-NavMenu/ [cpan.org]
1. http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Widgets-NavMenu/lib/HTML/Widgets/NavMenu.pm#CO
Re:Licensing Issue (Score:2)
Hi ciscott!
The actual licence for the module is the MIT X11 licence. The 'bsd' indicator for the licence is part of the module's meta-data because it's the closest choice for it in Module::Build, and in the PAUSE categorisation.
It does not make too much difference. The MIT X11 is considered part of the BSD family of licences, which includes licences that are completely non-copyleft as the original BSD, the modified BSD, MIT X11, the Apache licence, the Python licence, and so forth.
Even software