NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
No such thing (Score:1)
Hi
Quite possibly not.
I did say I was trying to clarify my ideas.
And, like all learners (yes, even you), I have to go thru a learning phase.
Life, Perl and REST are all topics to be learned.
Fundamentally, that means I do not possess absolute or infinite knowledge, and never will.
If I get things wrong, it doesn't matter. What matters is whether or not I get feedback in a form which helps me correct my misunderstandings.
And if I keep my misunderstandings to myself, they'll never be corrected. So - what can I do
Re: (Score:1)
You may have triggered the post, but it was not specifically addressed at you. A lot of people make this mistake.
Thing is: URI design and REST are orthogonal to each other. They are both good concerns, mind – they just have no dependency on each other. URIs can be messy and ugly and yet the system RESTful – or they can be clean and simple and yet the system effectively RPC-style. However, since people writing RPC-style services tend not to care about URIs, caring about URI design is often taken
Re: (Score:1)
Hi Aristotle
$many x $thanx for your clarification.
I felt it was no shorter that it needed to be, i.e. it said everything it needed to.
I did not take it negatively. I've extremely appreciative of the fact that it was not meant as a put-down, unlike some mailing lists which specialize in browbeating posters who don't know everything.
I've re-worked the article.
Cheers
Re: (Score:0)
Not claiming to be that knowledgeable, but what made me "understand" REST was the book "RESTful Web Services" [oreilly.com]. That in turn cites the original thesis on REST [uci.edu]. Some ideas that I took away were: