Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by ziggy (25) on 2005.07.27 18:47 (#42187) Journal

    I'm confused. If you were running as a GOP candidate for public office, (a) why didn't you mysteriously "relocate" to Wyoming shortly before the filing deadline, and (b) why didn't your residency in Wyoming trump your local jurisdiction's residency requirement?

    • Don't make me roll my eyes at you!

      Unforunately for complainers, the Constitution doesn't strictly define the requirement. There was nothing remotely illegal or unconstitutional, nor even against the spirit of the Constitution, in what Cheney did. :p
      • Hey, I never implied that there was il-this, im-that or un-the-other-thing about what Cheney did. I just thought that the GOP does its thing (relocate a candidate to Wyoming, thus increasing the state's population by 20%), while the Democrats do their thing (take a junket to Alaska to give the "My Heart Bleeds" speech that your brothers gave, or shop your platform around to every piddling little interest group to insure "political correctness").

        Sorta how the Cubbies beg a dead goat for forgiveness each