Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • No good deed goes unpunished.

    SA Mag is established, stable and reaches a large Perl using audience. Would you rather not have anything at all? Publishing a magazine is a lot of hard work for both the writers of the articles and the people who make it happen. I'd rather have the old journal back but that isn't going to happen. Be happy it is being published.

    • I don't see what is so hard to understand. People want TPJ, and they are not getting it, so they are upset. Seems perfectly reasonable to me. TPJ is NOT being published, that's the problem.
      • The content is being published, just in a different format. What about there being more than one way to do it?

        • Some of the content, yes. But it is not TPJ any longer; at least, not as we knew and loved it. I am not saying the new way is bad, and I don't think most others are saying that either; but it is not the same thing. It is something different. Yes, there is more than one way to do it, and those ways, being more than one, are different, and have different pros and cons.

          Allow that there is room for people to be unhappy that something they loved is gone.