NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Additional thoughts on "branding" Perl (Score:1)
Sad to hear that the branding exercise turned out so poorly (though not entirely surprising). I suspect that any attempt to work with a marketing agency that is not focused on marketing technology is going to result in something similar.
There's also lots to be said about the "pinko marketing [pbworks.com]" approach, for brands that have such a huge user community: i.e., marketing from the bottom-up vs. top-down.
I jotted down some thinking on the "branding Perl" question in a recent blog post: "Getting to the root of Perl's perception problems [newint.org]." As a consultant, and a technologist, I still believe that the approach outlined there is part of the answer for moving forward on these question.
Specifically, not just thinking about the One True Message(tm) for Perl, but -- more importantly -- thinking about the myriad truths that apply in different situations, and for different audiences. Also, with some reflection on the topic, I also believe that the Perl community could achieve some successful pro-active (not defensive) promotion by seeding some "open-source marketing kernels" and letting the community do the rest. Think of how the TIMTOWTDI spread effortlessly, and pro-actively.
Ideally, rather than over-branding, the kernel would be simple, flexible, and adaptable and would have ways for the community to continue to evolve it by contributing back. What if we could pro-actively develop Perl's brand in a way that is similar to how the actual language is developed -- therein lies the key.
Phillip.
Keeping technology simple since 2003
Reply to This
Re: (Score:2)
I really like the post you linked to and some of the responses. I can agree with the message. Back when I sold cars, I learned a couple of interesting things. First, selling Japanese cars was hard because I didn't give a damn about cars. Customers came in armed with invoice price lists, Consumer Reports, news articles, etc. They really were focused on value. When I switched to selling American cars, many people came in to "buy American" and while the cars were demonstrably a lesser value -- 3 versus 5
Re: (Score:1)
I must admit, I also like the "Creative power" messaging also. For me it's reminiscent of "Making Easy Things Easy and Hard Things Possible" -- which has always resonated for me when thinking about Perl's strengths.
But that "creative power" message is probably aimed squarely at developers, and not business executives. And that's where I was going in the post referenced above: There could be -- and probably should be -- different messaging to each potential audience. For developers, Perl is "creative power
Keeping technology simple since 2003