Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Adobe Sucks 1 Comment More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.

  • UFS vs. HFS (Score:2)

    by pudge (1) on 2004.07.22 17:45 (#32786) Homepage Journal
    I won't try to convince you to use HFS+, but I just want to note that everyone I know who uses it, regrets it.

    Some other notes: you can now have case-sensitive HFS+ partitions, and Tiger's command-line tools (cp ... maybe even tar? I forget) are supposed to work properly under HFS+.

    I do agree with your main point for the most part, but I believe this is primarily Apple's fault, as they do not do much to help developers with UFS problems, and with these moves to make HFS+ better for us geeks, it seems they might not be planning on fixing that any time soon. But who knows, maybe next year when Tiger comes out, you'll find it sufficient enough to your needs that you'll switch to it. :-)
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.