NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Syntactic sugar for less verbosity (Score:2, Interesting)
NewFind->file() instead of ->type('file')
NewFind->name( '*.mp3', '*.ogg' ) to get a shorter 'or' condition (in this case, can be written as NewFind->name( qr/\.(mp3|ogg)$/ ))
Provide an ->exec( \&command ) hook, similar to the -exec option to find(1) : i.e., gets the pathname as its only parameter, returns true or false.
Think about -prune and finddepth.
Re:Syntactic sugar for less verbosity (Score:1)
Yes, I was being very literal in a transliteration of a find(1) example, apart from making it longer of course.
NewFind->name( '*.mp3', '*.ogg' ) to get a shorter 'or' condition (in this case, can be written as NewFind->name( qr/\.(mp3|ogg)$/ ))
I like both of those.
I still think there's need for a form of
or. I just can't think of a good example right now.Re:Syntactic sugar for less verbosity (Score:2)
You still need an explicit
orwhen your conditions are not on the same variable. The form shown here works forvar == val1 or val2but notvar1 == val1 or var2 == val2. For example, file is greater than 500M or older than 3 days.J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Re:Syntactic sugar for less verbosity (Score:1)
var == val1 or val2seems to be likename('*.mp3', '*.ogg')andvar1 == val1 or var2 == val2is:As in rafaels "Good example for 'or'" post
Re:Syntactic sugar for less verbosity (Score:2)
Yes, you followed what I was saying. I was giving an example where you have to have an explicit F->or method.
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Reply to This
Parent