NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
rindolf v2.0 (Score:1)
come sail away
Re: (Score:2)
If you mean I literally sound like him, then wow, no, I don't. At all. :-)
If you mean my situation sounds like his, then yeah, a bit. Back then, it was considered bad form to ban people for disliking them, even Shlomi FIsh/rindolf. Note my reply [perl.org] on that journal entry: even though I was criticizing Shlomi Fish, I noted sungo was wrong to ban him.
That's how #perl pretty much always was, since it became a social channel. Apparently mst and apeiron have ruined it, as this is apparently now standard practice
Re: (Score:1)
No. It's standard practice to turn #perl on irc.perl.org into a channel that we're not ashamed for new users to come into. This is most of why *I* am not in there anymore.
This is not the #perl you grew up with and it's not the #perl that tolerated all of our fights and bullshit.
While I've not read a transcript of this latest interaction, you need to understand that times have changed and old regulars are not immune from the process. You can come along for the ride and help out or you can get out.
Re:rindolf v2.0 (Score:2)
sungo, you're confused.
You're right that it is not the old #perl, but you're wrong about everything else. Banning people who aren't doing anything bad or wrong is not how you keep people unashamed. There was no fight, mst just has a grudge, along with hobbs and apeiron. It's not about being unashamed, it's about being power-hungry dicks who cannot tolerate people who they have differences with. There's no way I could "help out" with that.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not confused about everything else because I helped plan and continue to support these changes behind the scenes. As others have pointed out, a lot changed while you were away.
You're taking things more personally than you need to, but that's generally your style. That's not new. The three folks you mentioned have been pretty instrumental in turning the channel around from the horrors of ages past. As a lead oper, they'll continue to get my support.
Let me put it a different way since nothing seems to be
Re: (Score:2)
You're taking things more personally
See, no, you are seriously confused. The ban was entirely, 100%, personal. It was based entirely on their dislike of me, and nothing else.
You don't contribute anything to the channel.
Shrug. Your opinion is noted, and due to its obvious ignorance, discarded: I many times, regularly, for years helped people with perl, Mac OS, all sorts of things. And I often asked questions and sought help. And people often sought my opinion and help on these and other matters, including, yes, politics.
you attempt to shout down anyone who you have a difference with
Now you're just lying, sungo. I NEVER did that. EVER. Engagi
Re: (Score:2)
Do you think any of that conversation helped irc.perl.org #perl be a better place for people to talk about and learn about perl?
Does this mean that there's actual discussion of Perl in #perl these days? I may have to visit again.
--
xoa