NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Again with the Java... (Score:1)
I posted a comment on perlmonks [perlmonks.org] recently about this need for Perl people to put down Java, but a couple more things:
The thing missing from this statement is some sort of qualification, like "for me". I am more productive in xemacs and a CLI, but I'd never presume to tell someone else their tools are shit
Re:Again with the Java... (Score:1)
Also here at use.perl, I know I'm preaching to the choir -- there's little need for me to be reasonable. I don't expect a lot of java-heads to be reading this. And if some are offended, perhaps they might want to see what all the fuss is about. If not, oh well. It is said that opinions are like assholes: everybody has one. So, don't mind me while I hang my butt out the window. :-D
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Again with the Java... (Score:1)
I hear you about Perl being ghettoized. But I've found that people who can put two clues together will be convinced when I quickly create something that works well and reliably. Or when someone asks, "Do you know if we can...?" and I immediately respond: "There's a module for that. I've used it. It's easy."
People who aren't convinced by results aren't going to be convinced by anything, and they'll pass from fad to fad and eventually (in a perfect world?) seek their natural level. After a few strenuous tri