Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by darobin (1316) on 2002.03.15 10:56 (#5966) Homepage Journal

    I haven't followed the details very closely because I don't care about Java, but the whole story is basically about Sun not playing nice with Open Source people. One of the problems is them refusing J2EE labelling on any Open Source implementation, the other is iirc not giving sufficient guarantees that specs can have OSS implementations without paying fees.

    If they had wanted to do something to help Microsoft kick them out into oblivion with .NET, they probably couldn't have found a better way.

    --

    -- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]

    • Sun has put themselves in a precarious position WRT Java. First, they want to encourage a healthy industry of commercial Java technology (which presumably feeds back into Sun through licensing fees). OTOH, they want to encourage widespread adoption of Java (which tends to be co-incident with open source implementations).

      This is the problem that Bjarne came across with C++. First, he was living in a world of proprietary C compilers and compiler technology; one relatively accurate measure of success for