NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
That's Funny! (Score:1)
Your comment on his post gives me the impression that you didn't understand Brooks's essay either. In my experience, almost no one does.
I read the essay two nights ago, and all I have to say is that--whether due to Moore's Law or whatever, I don't care--I'm at least an order of magnitude more productive doing test-driven development with a language that supplies automatic memory management and the creation of domain-appropriate abstractions than I would be with the best language and platform available fo
Re:That's Funny! (Score:2)
I'm at least an order of magnitude more productive doing test-driven development with a language that supplies automatic memory management and the creation of domain-appropriate abstractions than I would be
Of course, Brooke's assertion was that no single advancement would yield an order of magnitude improvement. You listed a combination of advancements.
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
Indeed. How curious then that a development process such as, oh, extreme programming, is obviously no silver bullet.
(Or it could be that a lot of people haven't actually read and thought about the essay.)
Re: (Score:2)
I used to treat blogs more like "hey, here's this thing I though