NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Maybe we should take a step back... (Score:1)
Come to think of, the process is in two steps:
With each release, a new specification is created.
Re: (Score:1)
Interesting idea, but perhaps it's better not to over-engineer this early? :)
I think it would be better to define a minimal spec that's easy to implement, and possible to extend when it's useful to do that. And of course, it should be human-readable/scannable firstly (as that's the role of the Changes files today). Using valid YAML ought to fix the "machine-parsable" requirement nicely.
YAML.pm seems to have tried to do something in that direction too, btw. Maybe worth taking a look/having a chat with so
Re:Maybe we should take a step back... (Score:1)
Yes, the YAML changelog is valid YAML. Apart from that, they started out to put each change as one stream entry, thus generating multiple entries with the same version instead of having one entry per version and the changes as a list. Well, that's a mistake that I wont make...
Reply to This
Parent