NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Did TPF give up on Perl 5? (Score:1)
Naturally everybody is free to think whatever they want, but when talking as a TPF representative which Nat clearly did, i think some of his statements are a bit inadequate.
I don't want to post quotes out of context so i just highlight some parts.
Linux Format: Could you tell me what your role is at the Perl foundation?
Nat Torkington: I am on the board at the Perl foundation; we oversee the activities that the executive directo
Re: (Score:1)
Shouldn't Nat have the opportunity to talk about other things he's doing, such as working on OSCON?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Did TPF give up on Perl 5? (Score:1)
But the point is that Nat was talking as a member of the Perl Foundation, not the Ruby Fountation.
And these kind of statements stab people in the back that still try (or tried) to promote Perl as a general purpose language,
especially for modern non-cgi web programming.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
That might surprise both Nat and the interviewer.
I write a fair bit of C code sometimes. I'm not and never have been a member of the Perl Foundation, but if I were, would you object to me mentioning that I write C? In the past few years, I've also written code in shell, C++, Java, Haskell, JavaScript, Python, Scheme, Visual Basic, T/SQL or something like it, SQL, Parrot Assembly, PPC assembly, and, yes,