Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Mono and OS X 9 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Care to explain what the plague of fink is?
    • google search for fink, feeling lucky [google.com]...
      --

      -- ask bjoern hansen [askbjoernhansen.com], !try; do();

    • It believes that you can beat DLL hell with sufficiently advanced tools. All I ever ended up with was a system for installing binary forms of that "A requires L 1.0, B requires L 2.0, installing one borks the other" misery, which meant I became miserable sooner but didn't actually remove the source of the misery.

      Now I build things in their own directories. /usr/local/ethereal will have all the shared libraries needed to run ethereal, and if Mono ever requires a different version of the library then nothi

      • > It believes that you can beat DLL hell with sufficiently advanced tools.

        Yeah. I really wanted Fink (or something with similar promises) to work, so I have given it a try. Three times by now, I think. Every time I have ended up with some seriously hosed software setups. That is, for the software that I did get installed at all. It sucketh overmuch. Nevermore.

        I've lost all hope of any binary-only open source distribution systems ever working, incidentally. Just give me the source, man.
  • care to explain what mono is, and why i should be excited about this? Yes, I know it's some gnu-ish clone of .net, but what can one *do* with it?
    • Mono's a virtual machine plus compilers (C# and Visual Basic for .NET), as well as ASP.NET (mod_perl/PHP type deal), and reimplementations of a lot of the Microsoft runtime libraries. It lets you ... write programs ... that ... do ... stuff.

      People whose opinions I respect have said [onlamp.com] that C# is much more fun to develop in than C for the types of programs that Unix folks typically write in C (network, file, GUI) and is about as fast. That sounds like an interesting claim, so I've been meaning to check it o

      • Almost everything is more fun to develop in than C. That includes Java, barely, but not C++.

        • Almost everything is more fun to develop in than C.

          That's a question of mindset. For people with a lot of hubris, C is the perfect language. It always gives me a good feeling to know that each C statement is translated into a few machine instructions and will never do more than I actually asked for.

          At the same time (and that makes C so cool), it's a language leading to relatively compact source code. You'd expect to be ending up writing a lot of code as the language is rather spartan, but often you don't
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.