NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
lighttpd? (Score:1)
Re:lighttpd? (Score:2)
Say you want to build an app - you don't want to fuss about deployment just yet. With this you can just download it, and run "./axkit" and start building your app. No downloading extra httpds and configuring them.
When you want to deploy, you can either deploy standalone like this without an extra httpd, or you can stick lighttpd or apache up front, giving you whatever extra features you might need from those (e.g. SSL).
All this is easier to debug than FastCGI, and can utilise proxy caching at the
Re:lighttpd? (Score:1)
It sounds to me like you're solving a different problem -- how to have a quick dev server. Most projects are doing this with HTTP::Server::Simple. I personally think it's a bad idea to develop on a server that isn't identical to what you deploy on,
Re:lighttpd? (Score:1)
Why is it appreciably harder to write a good dæmon vs. a FastCGI frontend? That doesn’t make any sense to me.
Re:lighttpd? (Score:1)
Re:lighttpd? (Score:2)
Reply to This
Parent