Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Sigh... For me there was a certain sad irony that the reason I put up the porn/erotica/semantic-definition-du-jour image in the first place was to intentionally distract the audience. :(

    As you noted, it worked. It just worked far far far far better than I would ever have intended it to. What I had hoped would be a 10 second distraction as a joke punchline turned into a 2 month long distraction.

    As another data point for your collection of information on this topic, I think I can identify the female equivalent.

    There's been an increasing number of workplaces that are putting "cleavage clauses" into their dress codes. They are explicitly restricting women's clothing (hem lines, necklines, etc) that is overtly sexual.

    The reasoning is another application of the distraction argument (minus the offense component). Meetings and business discussions are for work, you shouldn't be drawing people's attention away from the topic at hand and to yourself in this way.