NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
scary! (Score:1)
On the other hand, people like Chris Shiflett can make good money fixing security problems in other people's PHP code, and I wouldn't want to deny him his rent. Bring on the bad code!
Excellent answer (Score:1)
I understand enough to know I don't (Score:2)
I now understand enough about security, to know that I don't actually know all that much. I'm now more careful than I use to be, and I think the code I write is safe enough.
This week I've started to learn about a SAP system. For security reasons the root password on the AIX and Linux boxen it runs on are changed every 90 days - an unpopular feature that an auditor insisted on, yet nobody bats an eye lid that they are all running telnet, rsh and NFS unprotected on the company intranet. Contrasting this we
-- "It's not magic, it's work..."
At least we talk about it. (Score:2)
I think the difference with open source stuff is that we are willing to talk about it and fix it. Most people don't see it that way though: they don't want to hear about it.
I don't think you give perl enough credit (Score:2)
Things like a wide variety of ready-rolled strong encryption libraries and integration with standard SSL and SSH libraries, as well as the taint mode put it well ahead of languages like PHP, ASP and Cold Fusions.
The culture of testing and defensive programming is also stronger than in some other cultures - Java programmers are certainly hot on testing (at lea
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Giving an example (Score:2)