NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Go Enterprise (Score:1)
It would probably be an interesting read, but mostly I would just use it to subliminally fade the script/unreadable/toy/fringe aura Perl has in too many people's minds.
Re:Go Enterprise (Score:1)
Funny you should mention this; Andy Lester and I were talking about it just a couple of days ago.
We both want this book, for two main reasons:
In case anyone's interested, here are some notes [tmtowtdi.com] that I wrote along these lines quite a while back.
--Bill
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Go Enterprise (Score:2)
Possibly one of the biggest problems I can see with a book like that is the average Perl developer. For Java, I think you can really get away with having developers less skilled than many and still have a bit of safety. Encapsulation, type-safety and checked exceptions are examples of constraints that simply don't exist naturally in Perl, but are the safety net for the Java programmer. This also means that the Java programmer must weave that safety net rope-by-rope or he's not allowed to do his acrobatic
Re:Go Enterprise (Score:1)
Having actually seen "enterprise-class" Java, I label the parent post "-1, Unnecessary Community Self-Loathing".
Trust me, there are enough terrible and dedicated programmers in the world to jump through Java's hoops to produce absolutely hideous code.