NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Some nits to pick (Score:2)
First, the
set_logger()method is not actually setting a logger at all, which is confusing. It's setting a callback that returns a logger, so maybe it should beset_logger_factory()or something like that. This is particularly problematic since there's aget_logger()method, which doesn't return the thing passed toset_logger()!I'm not sure that passing in a sub ref is the best API either. My gut feeling is that "the average programmer" is
Re: (Score:1)
> confusing. It's setting a callback that returns a logger, so maybe it should be
> set_logger_factory() or something like that. This is particularly problematic since
> there's a get_logger() method, which doesn't return the thing passed to set_logger()!
You're right, set_logger() should be renamed, though I'm not sure I can bear to use "factory".
>
> I'm not sure that passing in a sub ref is the best API eith
Re:Some nits to pick (Score:1)
The name you are looking for is
register_logger.Reply to This
Parent