use Perl

• Take 'me for all you can get (Score:1)

  by ajtaylor (1283)

  These are the sort of clients who won't listen to reason. Have you showed them an itemized list of $$$ billed for fixing their mistakes? And how much larger it is compared to just writing some sanity checks? That sometimes opens people's eyes. And if it's only a few hours, wouldn't it be worth it for your company to just eat the time and be able to call the client first to tell them they screwed up? I've always loved showing someone that the "bug" is really their error. :=)

  You have to figure out if the ex

  --
  "Perl users are the Greatful Dead fans of computer science." --slashdot comment
  • Re:Take 'me for all you can get (Score:2)

    by Ovid (2709)

    I can't help but wonder if your title was a typo -- 'me versus 'em :)

    We have broken this down for them before but the response is typically something along the lines of "once we nail this thing, it won't change any more" (which, of course, is the reason most of us with jobs still have them.)

    You are correct in thinking that giving up the ongoing revenue from their stupidity is worth my sanity, but I have three other problems with issue. First, I hate to have a system that I know is wrong. The data vali
    • Re:Take 'me for all you can get (Score:1)

      by chromatic (983) on 2003.03.04 20:11 (#17715) Homepage Journal

      I'm not sure that interrupting your flow is the worst part. To me, it seems more important that you've taken time away from other tasks. If you've been scheduling time for various customers, you've made an agreement with them to accomplish something within a certain time period. Having to respond to emergencies is understandable, but if the "emergencies" happen regularly, they ought to be scheduled as such.

      Of course, if you have a service level agreement with the flammable customer, that's another thing altogether.

      Reply to This

      Parent