use Perl

• Correct use of ratio percentages (Score:1)

  by mugwumpjism (1871)

  Come now, we agreed in IRC that the correct way to express the difference was 63% more fastyness.
  • Re: (Score:1)

    by educated_foo (3106)

    I think that would be either "63% more fasting" or "50% less gluttony."
• Cool (Score:1)

  by davegaramond (3597)

  That's really cool. I'm starting to use Moose in some of my applications, but still hesitate using it in CGI (non-FastCGI) scripts, due to that +- 0.20 secs overhead which is still very heavy. Anyway, keep up the great work!
  • Re: (Score:1)

    by Stevan (6065)

    A major reason for this recent efforts to cut startup time is actually because we are working with Max Kanat-Alexander (of Bugzilla [everythingsolved.com] fame) to try and get Moose fast enough to be used in the refactoring/rewriting of Bugzilla. Max is already a fan of Moose and has used it on his (very cool) "All your VCS are belong to us" module VCI [cpan.org] module. I suspect that by mid-spring you will be able to deploy Moose apps under vanilla-CGI without a worry.

    - Stevan
    • Re: (Score:1)

      by sigzero (5768)

      You make me drool!
• Keep it going :) (Score:1)

  by Alias (5735)

  This looks like a good start, keep the fastyness improvements coming.
  
  Then maybe one day Moose::Tiny may actually be able to compete with Object::Tiny :)
  • Re: (Score:1)

    by Stevan (6065)

    Well, we will never beat you on memory usage, but I feel I must remind you that Moose::Tiny is 8% shorter to type than Object::Tiny ;)

    Also, we are really breathing down your neck with our accessors (from the Moose::Tiny POD):

      Benchmarking accessors...
               Rate moose  tiny
        moose 485/s    --  -19%
        tiny  599/s   23%    --

    And reallly, the difference in speed here is simply because Moose::Tiny c