Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

As simple as possible, but no simpler 6 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • I've taken to immediately deleting older versions of my modules, because I have a small enough userbase (i.e. maybe 2) that I want them all to keep up with the latest version. But since the old ones are still on backpan, could packagers just fetch from there instead?

    • What’s the point of having a mirror system if everyone fetches from BackPAN by default?

      • Define "everyone." First, most users want to install either a package or its prereqs. For them, either downloading the latest will be fine, or the package authors will have to do something special to maintain multiple release branches under the same name. Second, what's the point of having a mirror system if a packager downloads one (out-of-date) version once, then redistributes it through their own mirrors?

        • downloading the latest will be fine

          We’re talking about OS vendors like Linux distributions or FreeBSD here. For their users, downloading the latest released blessed by the package maintainer is what’s desired. Think of FreeBSD releases or Debian stable distributions: updates serve the purpose of propagating bug/security fixes only, but otherwise the system is as static as possible.

          And that answers your question about the value of everyone distributing outdated CPAN distribution releases as well.

          I don’t understand why you object in the first place, though. Do you think it’s a burden for module authors to leave a few recent versions around? Do you think it will cause harm if distributions lag behind CPAN by a bit, and if so, how does it stack up against the harm of distributions keeping up with the bleeding edge of CPAN without giving package maintainers the chance to check if the latest releases work in the OS in question?

            • Distributions have their own, er... distribution mechanisms outside of CPAN, so its mirroring is irrelevant as long as back versions are available *somewhere*.
            • I only have time to deal with one version of my modules, so for versions distributed through CPAN (i.e. by me), people should be working with the latest. There's nothing wrong with having old versions lying around on CPAN, but there's not much point, either -- I already have a VCS.
            • Where did I "object"?
            • Distributions have their own, er... distribution mechanisms outside of CPAN, so its mirroring is irrelevant as long as back versions are available *somewhere*.

              Not true, or at least not completely true. Fink, for one, has a really crappy mirror system, so I often get distros straight from CPAN. Authors who delete their releases too quickly are really irritating.

              Personally, I think ALL releases should stay on CPAN because who knows what stuff you (the author) broke when you put a new release up there. But
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.