NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
do FIRST not BEFORE (Score:1)
About implementing it, how about maintaining a loop iteration counter in some internal variable as $?I.
The same applies for LAST, but how do you know you are running the last iteration until after the loop check has failed?
Re: (Score:1)
Executing FIRST before anything in the loop makes it pretty uninteresting. It would be more useful if it were run conditionally but on its place.
...and that, to be clear, is how it's spec'd to work, and how I actually end up implementing it in the post.
The same applies for LAST, but how do you know you are running the last iteration until after the loop check has failed?
Also addressed in the blog post in whose comment thread you are commenting. :)
Re: (Score:1)
for 1..3 { say "enter"; FIRST { say "first run" } LAST { say "last run" } say "leave" }I would consider FIRST and LAST to be interesting if that code printed
enter, first run, leave, enter, leave, enter, last run, leave.Re:do FIRST not BEFORE (Score:1)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
Oops. That won’t work for
LAST, though it does forFIRST. Hmm.