NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
"news" (Score:1)
The only reason they are the "only one" is because such a court would never ever go after one of the real terrorist states. That Iraq has not
Re:"news" (Score:1)
I was wondering how long it was going to take you to bite. :-D
The last two links selected can safely be called extreme Left views. It is interesting to note that Noam Chomsky (whose 9-11 book I'm currently reading) and Wallerstein both see the extreme Left as discredited (and presumably consider themselves apart from that crowd).
It appears that you assume that the UN is anti-American and therefore their condemnation is illegimate. Chomsky and Wallerstein seem to believe that bad US foreign policy is to
Re:"news" (Score:1)
I think the truth is somewhere in between.
The point is that it is nearly self-evident, that by any possible measure what the US did in Nicaragua pales in comparison to what other nations, like Iraq, like Afghanistan, have done. Where's the condemnation? And it is also self-evident that Israel is not deserving of the lopsided condemnation the UN offers it.
This is not to say the US or Israel is perfect, or that they do nothing wrong, or that they aren't as bad as the next guy. But even assuming the furthest left I could reasonably go without checking my brain at the door, they are not that much worse than the next guy that they deserve such lopsided treatment. That's my point.
Reply to This
Parent