NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
URIs != webpages (Score:1)
XML namespaces use URIs as identifiers – Uniform Resource Identifiers. URIs need not actually be resolvable to anything. Even if a URI starts with the “http:” scheme, that means nothing more than that HTTP ownership rules apply; it does not mean there has to be a page there if you actually try to dereference the URI. (HTTP ownership rules are that whoever owns the DNS for the host part of the HTTP URI can mint new HTTP URIs with that host part.)
There used to be a distinction such that UR
Re:URIs != webpages (Score:2)
I think you missed the main point of the post. The PURL, as in Persistent URL, didn't exist.
I know the difference between a URL and a URI. The fact that a URI didn't resolve didn't prompt the post. The fact that it used a supposedly persistent address did ;)
Reply to This
Parent