Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • If we had a terrorist attack the week of the election, Bush would be criticized if he DIDN'T postpone the election, because "of course the attack will scare people into voting to keep the incumbent in power."

    I think they absolutely should figure out now what steps would need to be taken to postpone, so that if something does happen and it is deemed to be necessary, it can happen.
    • by hfb (74) on 2004.07.12 11:09 (#32385) Homepage Journal
      yeah, but I'll bet some guy in Kandahar in the pub where the CIAs 'man on the ground' got this bit of 'intelligence' is likely laughing his ass off. They don't need to attack since the fear is so cheap and easy it's almost not even sporting anymore.