NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Coax is better! (Score:2)
Re:Coax is better! (Score:1)
CDs do not have this internal clock in the encoding, so clock skew on the CD can be transported over optical, but not over coaxial. This only matters if your CD plater is iffy and produces clock skew to begin with. So in the general case, there is no difference. And then all your components need to be very good to detect the difference.
It is very interesting to test this out. I have a CD player with analog out and digital out, as well as a DVD player with both. My amplifier can take coaxial and digital inputs for both, so I have three DA converters that I can use to decode CDs and six transports.
In the end my listening ears preferred the DA from the (very good) CD player over the other two, the amplifier was reasonable but not great and the DVD was downright awful with CDs. So now I am hooked up with analog RCA/tulip cable from CD to amp and digital optical from DVD to amp. The DVD is just a reader for the audio, it does a great job on the video decoding though. The amp does the DTS/DD 5.1 decoding and is great for disturbing the neighbours.
Reply to This
Parent