NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
CSS buggy in safari? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if this is intentional, but the "thing" obscures the page. Can it be made to be part of the page?
Allow me to quote myself for context (with added emphasis):
I don't know what you mean by "a part of the page" -- I assume you mean static and doesn't move? -- but that wouldn't help here, since where it is on the lefthand side would cover up something regardless. Anyway, any change like that would require additional work, which we will instead put into the horizontal version (not sure if you're familiar
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I mean stop making it a floating widget over the page. Put it somewhere into the main part of the page.
OK.
Does it need to float? I guess it *might* help on slashdot with hundreds of comments, but frankly it's just painful this way here.
Yes, but only because it is on the side of the page. It's been horizontal and floating on useperl for months, and I cannot recall a complaint about it. So when we get the horizontal version of this one working, I suspect you will find it unobtrusive.
Re: (Score:1)
It's been horizontal and floating on useperl for months, and I cannot recall a complaint about it.
I got irritated by the horizontal floating bar.
Firefox treats it as a separate page element, and a mouse's scroll wheel gets stuck on it: if scrolling down the page with a scroll wheel (or laptop trackpad equivalent), it stops once the floating bar is under the pointer, and I have to move the pointer down to a non-floaty part of the page before scrolling can continue.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I refuse to use the new system, because of it.
Is that strong enough?
Re: (Score:2)
I refuse to use the new system, because of it.
Is that strong enough?
Re:What's wrong with the new comment controller (Score:2)
It's strong, but it doesn't mean much. What's wrong with it?
GEe, what a question. I don't want to use it, because I don't like it one bit, and now you want me to give a detailed critique.
So, what's wrong with it. It gets in the way. It's big, it's about twice as high and twice as wide than it needs to be. It's not attached to the window, nor to the document, which are the only two acceptal modes, in my book. Instead, it's floating around, with a mind of its own. There's no way to get rid of it, it's always covering something. And you can't scroll the page from und
Re: (Score:2)
It's strong, but it doesn't mean much. What's wrong with it?
GEe, what a question. I don't want to use it, because I don't like it one bit, and now you want me to give a detailed critique.
Not particularly, but the point I was originally making was that I was not inclined to change it because no one was complaining. You responded you didn't like it. Well, fine, but that's not enough for me to change it ... wouldn't you agree?
So, what's wrong with it. It gets in the way. It's big, it's about twice as high and twice as wide than it needs to be.
Much wider than it needs to be, yes. Not sure about high. (I assume you are talking about the horizontal bar that was here previously, and will return in some form, and not the current vertical one.)
It's not attached to the window, nor to the document, which are the only two acceptal modes, in my book.
Why?
There's no way to get rid of it, it's always covering something.
Not true. There is a box in the top right of the bar. Click
Re: (Score:2)
I know I don't use it purely because I don't find the old comment system particularly bad but I could be in the minority.
Re: (Score:2)
I cannot recall a complaint about it.
Could it be because not that many are using the new discussion system?
Yes, it could. Still, I won't consider changing something no one complains about, that works fine for me. :-)
Just out of curiosity, how many of the regular visitors to use.perl actually use it?
Not sure. I don't feel like looking it up right now.
I know I don't use it purely because I don't find the old comment system particularly bad but I could be in the minority.
I didn't find it bad either; this is just about making it more efficient to use.