NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Simple. (Score:1)
Re:Simple. (Score:2)
And perjury is worse than sending innocent kids to be killed for personal profit how exactly? I'm curious, really. We don't at all care about sex lies, but we could well reinstate the giullotine for a head of state that'd treat his people thusly.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Simple. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Simple. (Score:3, Insightful)
Legality has little to do with scandal. If I steal an apple from a shop it's illegal but it'll hardly turn out to be a major scandal. I'm interested in the disproportion of scandals, not on why no one has the legal power to finally put the Bush administration in gaol.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Injecting a little bit (OK, a lot) of truth (Score:2)
2. There still is evidence of Iraq working with al Qaeda. Call it unproven if you will, but to say it is a lie is to discredit evidence that has not been discredited.
3. Technically, this was never said in the State of the Union. Think on. It was never said in the SotU that Iraq was seeking, only that British intelligence believed that it was. And again, see #2 about lie vs. unproven.
4.
Re:Injecting a little bit (OK, a lot) of truth (Score:2)
slash bug (Score:2)
Pudge, there's a bug in slash, here. The comment's too long to view on the journal entry page, and even when you click "Read the rest of this comment," it is truncated. It ends with " 19. This is a gross distortion of the facts. All along the U.S. said they would probably use Iraqi oil money to help fund rebuilding of Iraq, and that the mo." However, if you click "reply to this," then you get to see the end of the message.
I noticed the post appeared to be truncated yesterday, and then ran across the sa
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Re:slash bug (Score:1)
Re:slash bug (Score:2)
Cool; thanks. The more I wrote about it, the less I was sure it was a bug, actually. ;)
In case noone ever tells you, I love slashcode and wish every site on the internet worked that way. Keep up the good work.
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Squid Pro Quo (Score:2)
This is true, because it hasn't been proven to have been known to be untrue!!
Sources (Score:2)