NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Email validation (Score:1)
I should probably add email validation to CPAN::Reporter. This wouldn't catch "nospam@dontspamme.com" but would at least ensure a valid RFC format. Do people think that's useful or is this pointless?
If pointless, what would we need to have it be relevant? Send a test message and see if the MX accepts it? That's going to be a pain to do reliably because of firewalls. Just check that there is an MX for the given domain? Is that enough?
And which CPAN modules are back-compatible enough to add as a pre-requisite? (5.005 at least, with wide platform support.)
Other ideas?
-- dagolden
Reply to This
Re: (Score:1)
rjbs
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As Dave mentions, whether an address is RFC compliant doesn't guarantee a real address. Whether the domain resolves to an MX record again doesn't mean the address exists. The only way is to send a mail to the user requesting a response to verify themselves, such as happens with several mailing lists. With so many people getting involved with testing now and the value of ensuring authors can contact testers should they need clarification of any reports, then registration is a logic next step.
With the HTTP i