use Perl

• die_on_fail(&?) (Score:1)

  by melo (332)

  Have you consider using

        die_on_fail {
              # your tests go here.
        }

  ?

  --
  life is short
  • Re: (Score:2)

    by Ovid (2709)

    Actually, I've been thinking about putting a failure handler there. I think it's a better solution:

    use Test::Most
        tests   => 3,
        on_fail => sub {
            # whatever you want
        };

    That gives end users maximum flexibility.

    Right now, though, I've discovered that the latest release, which incorporates Test::Deep, doesn't play well with Test::Class [cpan.org].
    • Re:die_on_fail(&?) (Score:1)

      by melo (332) on 2008.06.20 10:32 (#63515) Homepage Journal

      But that only gives you a global handler, with little knowledge of the test that failed.

      The other suggestion is more local. And even lexical.

      --
      life is short

      Reply to This

      Parent

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Ovid (2709)

        Actually, I'd be passing in the same information the current die handler gets, so you would have complete knowledge of the test which failed (well, as much as Test::Harness has). And it would be file scoped, not global.