NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Well... (Score:1)
It's not such a great country to live in if you're a person of color, though it could be worse (or better). It's not such a great country to live in if you're very poor. Though again, that could be worse and better, depending on where you look.
And the really fucked up thing about the US has very little to do with how its own citizens are treated, but rather with how the US tre
Re:Well... (Score:0)
What are you talking about? Is it your opinion that the US is holding these countries down? Let's look at two of your examples:
1) Africa. Not a single great nation has come out of Africa since Hannibal & Cleopatra. I'm sure Africa's "demise" had much more to do
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Russia, yes, had internal problems. The cold war, explicitly designed to destroy the Russian economy, also didn't help.
But here are a few others:
- Iran, where we installed a dictator that served our (oil) interests. That dictator's oppression was so severe that he was overthrown by a fundamentalist Islamic regime, which has been making Iran miserable ever since. Remember, at
Re:Well... (Score:0)
True, but then let's keep in mind that we were still Europeans when we were first dealing in the slave trade. In other words, we have plenty of company in that area.
Nor did US support of the South African apartheid regime
True, but then it was partially US pressure that ended it as well. I can also tell you that the American public despised the South African regime. And where does the South African government have its origins, hmmm?
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Replace "US" with "Russian" and "contras" with "Sandinistas" and you would have an equally accurate statement.
No, that's not true. The Sandinastas received basically no foreign aid from Russia. What they did do, because they were cut off from all trade with the US and Europe (by the US), was trade with Russia. Nothing wrong with that. The US did that through the entire cold war too.
As to Turkey, I know why the US supports them, but that doesn't make it ok.
Colombia - what you propose is a false dilemna. There are groups who are working for democratic change in Colombia who could use our support.
In Cambodia, the US supported the Khmer Rouge because they (the Khmer Rouge) were fighting the Vietnamese. In fact, the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia was what finally ending the Khmer Rouge terror in Cambodia.
This is part of a disturbing trend I'm seeing in world opinion. It seems *everything* is our fault. It's either too much, not enough, or the wrong way. We just can't do *anything* right, no matter how hard we try.
Well, the US is not really trying to do anything right. It is trying to make sure that conditions are suitable for making lots of money from other countries' labor and natural resources. And in that sense, it has succeeded admirably.
Well, autarch, which country are *you* from so I can tally up how *your* country has screwed up the world?
I've lived in the US my entire life. Tally away!
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Well... (Score:0)
Actually, Pinochet was the dictator of Chile, wasn't he?
As to Turkey, I know why the US supports them, but that doesn't make it ok
They *are* part of NATO. You can lump most of Europe (i.e. NATO) in there right with us if we're *evil* for supporting the Turkish government.
Colombia - what you propose is a false dilemna. There are groups who are working for democratic change in Colombia who could use our support
It would take direct mi
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Yep, you're right. Brain fart. Same point, different country.
They *are* part of NATO. You can lump most of Europe (i.e. NATO) in there right with us if we're *evil* for supporting the Turkish government.
I do lump them in with that. Western Europe has long been a supporting player in US malfeasance abroad, though they often draw the line a bit sooner, though England usually toes the US line the longest.
It would take direct military support
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Perhaps. It's also been the single greatest benefactor.
Re:Well... (Score:1)
I think you'll find that, as far as the rest of the world is concerned, the balance comes down heavily weighted on the 'malevolent' side.
But the Marshall Plan was really good. Thanks for that.
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Re:Well... (Score:1)
Re:Well... (Score:1)