NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
10 years is _way_ too optimistic (Score:1)
C was being used to write operating systems 33 years ago, and it's still going strong. There will always be a call for a language that lets you be somewhat platform-independent while still giving you the ability to get very close to the bare metal.
There is a place for functional programming--many places, as a matter of fac
10 years ago, people were still using turbo pascal (Score:1)
However, a game, a word processor, a network daemon, you'd be writing in Haskell, Perl, or perhaps Java (but by then, Java will probably look very Haskelly, and Perl 6 already does).
Re:10 years ago, people were still using turbo pas (Score:2)
I'm not so sure.
First, C will never completely die. Assembly language is still useful, even if it isn't used by 99.44% of programmers. But the idea of assembly language is still very useful, and still deserves to be one of many cornerstones of any good CS degree. And, periodically, the idea of assembly is useful when
Re:10 years ago, people were still using turbo pas (Score:1)
Your argument against C# would be stronger if Microsoft had demonstrated that it could actually write software anymore. :)
Reply to This
Parent