NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Fix It! (Score:1)
The source code for the site is available. Commit access is easy to get. If you have a better design, nothing stands in the way of your improvements.
Re: (Score:1)
About ten years of lost progress stand in the way of improvements. Need I list the number of programming languages that came and went in that time?
Thankfully I am not paying for any of the group developing perl 6, I would be pretty annoyed if that were the case.
I can fix the webpage, sure. I cannot, however, fix the last 10 years of perl 6 debacle.
Re: (Score:2)
So do you have anything useful to say, or are you just saying "GODDAMN THAT SUCKS WAH WAH WAH YOU ALL ARE DOODOOHEADS FOR WORKING ON IT," because really that's about all I'm seeing.
--
xoa
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Halting Perl 6 development today will not cause stable threading in Perl 5 to appear sooner than it otherwise would. Neither "stable threading in perl 5" nor the other features you've mentioned are blocked because of Perl 6 development. As far as I know, none of the existing Perl 6 developers are at all interested in working on these featu
Re: (Score:1)
Well, if I can help... I've given this issue some thought in the past and can put together a wishlist of what *I* think would be useful. Of course, it's just my opinion, but stealing from a few other langs.
If that sounds good, where do you want me to send the info? - ank
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, that would be terrific! The ideal place for such ideas would be on the perl6-language mailing list. I will be honest up front that sometimes discussions and threads on that list quickly become bikesheds and messages get initially warnocked, but all of the thoughts and ideas that enter that list do get noticed and consideration from the core design team. Not everyth
Re: (Score:1)
I have reconsidered, after reading where the logo came from, and how only a person or two gave the idea of getting professional help a second thought. [perl.org]
I will not be sending you anything. I don't wish to have any part in it; mostly because I fear for my mental wellbeing.
Re: (Score:2)
By which, do you mean the part about larry suggesting it feminizes Perl?
I remain in utter awe of the whole thing....have the entire lot of folks gone off their meds or something? Women who survive in this business will not be seduced into thinking a language with a feminine butterfly must be a lot less full of assholes tha
Re: (Score:1)
It's not just that. It's also the complete lack of a coherent plan to promote the programming language. It's the idea that planning doesn't matter at all, and that "it will be done when it's done." It's a bunch of the comments that I've seen. If you really want, I can quote...
I agree that it doesn't influence, but only when it's sane. At the end of the day, a client has to buy this, and this guy is not going to put his money on a language that doesn't have a coherent attitude towards promotion, marketing,
Re:Fix It! (Score:2)
Well, I don't know that professionalism or a well-formed plan is always so needed, especially in the original spirit of opensource but, to anyone who thought P6 was, or has become, a joke by way of 8 years of design will not be dissuaded from that position by that site. It might even persuade many others who were merely neutral into thinking the language has reached it's comic endpoint.
And no, a man who can't confront the people who make perl an unfriendly misogynistic place will not get a pass with a fluffy butterfly by suggesting it does anything towards that end.
Reply to This
Parent