Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Whew! 3 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • According to the Mason list, some people still use CM even though you are right about its maintenance level. THe feeling I got from the Mason list is that CM is a much less complex program and preferable for some because it is easier to hack into and personalize.

    • That's absolutely true. But the problem is that it's not being actively maintained. Bricolage, OTOH, is under very active development, and comes with a whole raft of features. But I would certainly agree that Bricolage overkill for some needs, and that Mason CM might be more appropriate for simpler situations.

    • Well, without a maintainer, it's dead, plain and simple. If people want to use it, great, but it'd silly for us to promote it in the book when there's a well-maintained and more modern system available.

      Plus when Mason 1.10 comes out I have a feeling the old Mason-CM code will _really_ be dead, because 1.10 will have a fair number of API changes and who knows whether Mason-CM will survive.

      It's worth noting that the MasonHQ site has a very minimal CM system as part of its code. This CM-lite is loosely bas
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.