use Perl

• Spam is not email (Score:2)

  by rafael (2125)

  Suppressing email won't suppress spamming. As long as you have publicly available contact information, allowing people you don't know to leave you a message directly and cheaply, you will get spammed, no matter what the media is. The only way to cut it down is to make it expensive (in time, space, CPU or money) to send bulk messages.
  • Re:Spam is not email (Score:2)

    by jdavidb (1361) on 2003.09.04 11:58 (#23854) Homepage Journal

    Actually, I find slash-style moderation to be the most effective method of separating wheat from chaff. I love slash message boards far more than email for communication, for this reason. There's all kinds of spam and trolls on slashdot, but I never see them because I browse at +4.

    --
    J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers

    Reply to This

    Parent

    • Re:Spam is not email (Score:2)

      by rafael (2125)

      For informal discussion, slash has proven to be more effective than, say, Usenet. But I mainly use email for getting work done; that involves archiving, attachments (patches), search, classification, off-line availability, etc.

      On the other hand I read lots of perl.org mailing lists via NNTP -- the ones that I don't need to archive or search carefully. NNTP newsgroups, requiring some authentication to post, would be an effective replacement to SMTP mailing lists, if the From: header is carefully replaced by
      • Re:Spam is not email (Score:1)

        by drhyde (1683)

        Slash more effective than Usenet? Maybe for you, not for me. I still use Usenet every day, and I see little in the way of spam or other abuses. I find Usenet far easier to use than Slash-based websites. No doubt it depends to a large extent on the groups you read.