NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
--Larry Wall in perl.c from the perl source code
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I think that's a good compromise (Score:1)
I would prefer to have warnings for possible problems that you would only run into by accident. If you would not want that to happen, you could just declare so.
What's Rolsky's position on the subject, If I may ask?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know how Dave feels, but Stevan Little has already said "no". He prefers new features to be tested in a MooseX:: class and that makes sense to me.
Re: (Score:1)
We always return to the same issue though, of whether new users should have to explicitly declare features which make it easier to use, instead of experts explicitly expressing to ignore different warnings.
Moose has become a stepping stone in an Enlightened Perl and any Enlightened programming language, and users should not be bitten by these simple things. Also, users should not (by design), have to know about various MooseX modules to fix the behavior for them.
We should work on making these easy to use fo
Re:I think that's a good compromise (Score:2)
You're not stepping out of line at all. I think everyone who has thoughts on these matters should feel free to chip in.
Reply to This
Parent