Last month, O'Reilly pulled off OSCon 2002. The event that kicked this off was The Perl Conference 1.0 in 1997. The second conference was called The Perl Conference 2.0, and was held at the same location in 1998.
Now, just try to find any record of either of these events anywhere at O'Reilly.com or (the O'Reilly run) Perl.com. Most of the history of these events has vanished -- the only links that Google can find about TPC 1 allude to the fact that either (1) it happened or (2) spawned O'Reilly's conference business. The TPC 2.0 links are far fewer, but do list the six people who won $1000 awards for "best paper"s. (Yes, Damian got one.)
Sadly, the wayback machine doesn't do much better...
Some history preserved (Score:2)
If you like, I can make copies and send them to you (or someone) where they can be
Re:Some history preserved (Score:2)
What I'd like to see preserved are things like the CFP, the program and schedule, the refereed papers, new
Some Links (Score:2)
Both the first two TPCs are mentioned in the Perl Timeline [perl.org]. There are links to various people's photos.
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
This depends on your definition of 'lost'.
O'Reilly, to the best of my knowledge, never had conference proceedings on-line for TPC1 or TPC2. At TPC1 we were all given a very splashy gold binder with 'THE POWER OF PERL' emblazoned on the spine to accompany the mousepad, tote bag, t-shirt and 20 pounds of other stuff I had to carry around. The binder was beautiful and had tabs for 'perl and the web', 'programming perl', perl for win32', 'user applications', website' and 'addendum'. In the front of the binder
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
As I originally mentioned, there's no reference to the older conferences anywhere on oreilly.com or perl.com. The online artifacts are no longer.
Looking back, I did overstate the case somewhat.
Right. That year, they were distributed on CD, and for a while O'Reilly had put a copy of that CD online. I've got a few copies buried somewhere in the detrius
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
Is there any reason to expect ORA to keep a 5+ year archive of the conferences? The web is mercurial at best. I make PDFs of everything from web pages I find these days since, as the timeline surely illustrates in its 600+ links, things go missing very often and never return. Such is the nature of the electronic world...pull the power plug and it's gone.
I only vaguely remember the 2.0 CD and can't seem to locate it in my pile of stuff...maybe Gnat can find an extra lying about....but I doubt it would rema
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
Expect? Maybe, maybe not. There's probably more precedent and incentive for conference organizers to focus exclusively on upcoming revenue opportunities (er, conferences) than keeping an archive of past events.
Then again, not every conference organizer is particularly interested in fostering a community, rather than making money by attracting a attendees to upcoming events. Two organizers who are trying to build healthy
Re:Some Links (Score:2)
Do YAPC and USENIX keep online archives of all their conferences? These are both community based conferences who, to the best of my knowledge, keep little of the conference proceedings online with USENIX only listing the bibliography and YAPC having abstracts and links to the authors pages sans proceedings. It takes time and someone to manage all that data to keep it online in a coherent presentation. Maybe you could volunteer to be the ORA and YAPC proceedings archivist.
Procedings published ? Listed on Amazon (Score:1)
but warns of Limited Availability.
dc
Re:Procedings published ? Listed on Amazon (Score:2)
Availability of the print proceedings isn't really as important as keeping an online record of the conference t
Re:Procedings published ? Listed on Amazon (Score:1)
[*] TPC3 may have had print/photocopied proceedings, but TPC4 certainly was the first year that they were bound in a glossy volume.
TPC3 did indeed have (paper bound) proceedings, "Perl Conference 3.0 Refereed Papers.". It's fairly hefty - slightly larger than 4.0 (which was larger than 5.0), but it has neither page numbers nor cataloging information. It does however contain some real gems such as Damian's Coy (all ten pages written in haiku), Class::Multimethods, and Tie::SecureHash papers :)
Second Dark Age? (Score:2)
To begin with, in order to have a Second Dark Age there'd need to have been a First One already. And that's a highly controversial topic to boot.
Second -- and much more importantly -- don't you see something fundamentally flawed about your approach? No? Where did you look for info about TPC? Google, and a few other places on the internet. Think '97. Think where info on that may be. What are the chances that it is on the net somewhere? Small imho. It may be -- and in fact surely is -- in personal ma
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Second Dark Age? (Score:2)
:) Some of us spend a good bit of time collecting perlish bits that may not be readily available but, maybe in 20 years or so, will be appreciated by posterity. I have one gem that I ran across yesterday that, in light of last september, would raise a few eyebrows though it was a spoof from 2000. Ah, nostalgia :)
If you are into perl history, join the packrats mailing list and share your archives. I just bought a honking firewire disk to consolidate my archives into one place. I always welcome more stuff.
Re:Second Dark Age? (Score:2)
Actually, the issue isn't really about throwing stones at O'Reilly for not making my trigger happy lifestyle as easy as I want it to be, although I do see how you could interpret it that way. The issue I want to raise is that for all of the talk about Perl community, there seems to be a distinct lack of interest
TPC3 and earlier (Score:2)
When the ORA online publishing group folks were removing the old conferences from the web, I told them to make sure there was a tarball archive available. I requested those archives on Friday, so we'll find out next week whether they actually listen to me or not :-)
--Nat
Re:TPC3 and earlier (Score:2)
Hunting through google and the wayback machine, it looked like a simple case of not finding/making a place for the old materials in a few web redesigns. Thanks for saving it.