The original edition of Inside Macintosh (later known as Inside Macintosh, Volume I) was a reference book of 25 chapters, each written with the expectation that you had read and fully understood the other 24 chapters it built on.
I don't know that I've ever seen this term in print. I went to school at a heavily Mac-centric university (starting in the days of System 6.x), and I may have picked up the term from some of my mac hacking friends (who probably picked it up from usenet, some mailing list, a magazine, whatever).
Google doesn't know much about this usage. That journal post of mine is currently within the top 20 hits for the term. (Most of the hits are what you would expect, pages that contain the term
inside macintosh and the word
Has anyone else seen this usage? I really like using it because it is a concise explanation of the problem of overly self-referential technical documentation, even if the term is more than slightly obscure. It's pretty easy to explain and understand; most of us have come across at least a mild case of this problem.
As far as I know, there aren't any other examples of self-referential documentation that are widely known and predate 1984, so I suspect that this formulation has some kind of priority. But are there any other terms that pithily summarize the concept of "self-referential technical documentation"?