I like the idea of Continuity. I don't, however, want to go back to using CGI.pm (or printing strings directly) to generate HTML. That's probably what Brock has in mind with Continuity::Widget. However, sorry, I also don't want to use a widget system hacked up just for Continuity, and that module seems to only be a placeholder right now anyway.
What I'd really like to do is somehow integrate Continuity with my favorite templating system, HTML::Mason. Are these two too different conceptually, though? Mason is based on requests, while Continuity is trying to get rid of them? Not sure yet how Continuity's Mapper and Adapter objects fit with Mason's Request, Resolver, ApacheHandler, Interpret... Anyone have ideas?