Just another perl hacker somewhere near Disneyland
I have this homenode [perlmonks.org] of little consequence on Perl Monks [perlmonks.org] that you probably have no interest in whatsoever.
I also have some modules [cpan.org] on CPAN [cpan.org] some of which are marginally [cpan.org] more [cpan.org] useful [cpan.org] than others.
Finally, a report on dynamic languages in a magazine that the boss reads (mine, anyway). First Iron Python on
The article mentions Javascript, Python, Perl, PHP, and Ruby (and grouped under "other" in a sidebar, there's Eiffel, Erlang, Lisp, MS PowerShell, Prolog, Smalltalk, TCL and VBScript), though it does have a bit of FUD sprinkled throughout about dynamic languages from some "experts", e.g. "Dynamic languages suffer from some inherent limitations that make them inadequate for 'large software'", and "One of the challenges with dynamic languages is how do you test it, how do you debug it, and how do you make sure that your application is secure...all of this is tough to do with static languages. It's incredibly harder in dynamic languages", and there's the usual stuff about compile-time checking of data type errors, but all-in-all, it's mostly a positive article (and there is no bashing of any individual dynamic language
NBT: Dynamic Languages 0 Comments More | Login | Reply /