Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

rjbs (4671)

rjbs
  (email not shown publicly)
http://rjbs.manxome.org/
AOL IM: RicardoJBSignes (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: RicardoSignes (Add User, Send Message)

I'm a Perl coder living in Bethlehem, PA and working Philadelphia. I'm a philosopher and theologan by training, but I was shocked to learn upon my graduation that these skills don't have many associated careers. Now I write code.

Journal of rjbs (4671)

Wednesday April 18, 2007
08:00 PM

them ol' fashioned new phone no speed improvement blues

[ #33027 ]

My new phone arrived today. My first impressions are that its menu interface is very slow, that its construction is unimpressive, and that it feels like a brick compared to my RAZR.

All of this would be unimportant, if I was getting the 70 kilobytes per second that T-Mobile says I should get, minimum, with EDGE. (Have you ever noticed how hard it is to find a simple prediction for how fast a phone's packet internet can go?)

Instead, I got the Bluetooth modem connection working very quickly, only to find that I was getting about 10 kilobytes per second, up from five or six on my RAZR. A call in to T-Mobile led me through some diagnostics, and then basically ended with, "Gee, I don't know. It should be faster, but..."

The frustrating part of the call was that the representative (who was otherwise quite helpful and friendly) didn't seem to have a good concept of what I should expect, or what speeds were reasonable -- and that's after I was transferred to a data plans specialist. She kept saying, "It's not going to be like super fast, it's just going to be dollops," and other bizarre things. I would have preferred, "Yeah, anything under X is too slow, but don't expect to ever see more than Y." I was still seeing 1-3 second latencies, so I don't think it will be any better for bulk or interactive data transfer.

I'm going to see how the speed goes for one day of real use (one trip to and from Philadelphia) tomorrow, but I expect that the difference in speed is going go unnoticed, even as I squint to see it.

I looked into Cingular, and their 3G network seems to cover only about half of my route between work and home. If the other half is fast EDGE, and if the phone can transition from one to the other without having to reconnect, then I might just see a reason to switch.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • My latest project sees me running a network of phone-connected embedded devices. Current we've rolled out about 5, we're heading for 100+

    Even with the 5 of them (identical hardware, identical network, carrier and plans) there is an obvious variability with location and antenna.

    From our worst to our best, I'm seeing around a 10 to 1 ratio.

    Last night, our worst machine took 35 minutes to pull a 3 meg file (I'm frankly amazed it held up for that long).

    Our best connection can pull it in a few minutes.

    It may wel
    • That's almost promising. What I'm really looking for is a significant improvement in the average speed I get on the road between ABE and PHL. Of course, my tests last night were in Bethlehem, which is where I expect to get the second best speeds. It's a pretty dense area of coverage.

      Then again, if it turns out that I get better coverage on the turnpike outside Podunksville, so be it!
      --
      rjbs