In the latest Who's Who book, they used four times more to describe Hillary Clinton's accomplishments than they did for Bill Clinton's. Heh.
Who's Who seems pretty stupid to me though. If you are really someone "important," you don't need to be in the book; if you aren't someone "important," then you don't deserve to be in the book. In theory, anyway. In reality, anyone who gives them money to have an entry published is "important."