petdance andy@petdance.comhttp://www.perlbuzz.com/AOL IM: petdance (
Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: petdance (
Add User, Send Message)
Jabber: petdance@gmail.com
I'm Andy Lester, and I like to test stuff. I also write for the Perl Journal, and do tech edits on books. Sometimes I write code, too.
Re: Tests are a binary issue (Score:1)
When using other peoples test suites seeing, for example, 99% ok tells me something very different from seeing 3% ok. For me the difference between "nearly there apart form this bit of functionality that I don't care about" and "completely f**ked" is useful. Yes I can figure it out from the test/pass numbers - but the percentage gives me a handy overview. Math is hard!
Not something I
Re: Tests are a binary issue (Score:2)
Re: Tests are a binary issue (Score:2)
There's no difference between blowing 3 tests out of 100, or 3 out of 10,000. So 97% is no worse than 99.97%.
--
xoa
Re: Tests are a binary issue (Score:2)
As an alternative, how about replacing the percentages with some pithy text?
"You missed one."
"A pair slipped by."
"You've got a few problems."
"Uh, oh. Not good."
"Hands up, and back away from that keyboard."
Re: Tests are a binary issue (Score:1)
Maybe if Coy [cpan.org] is loaded?
Computers are binary, humans aren't (Score:2)
Was there some other reason for this change?
Re:Computers are binary, humans aren't (Score:2)
--
xoa
Makes sense to me (Score:2)