Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

[ Create a new account ]

nicholas (3034)

nicholas
nwc10+useperl@colon.colondot.net
http://www.ccl4.org/~nick/

Perl 6 Groupie

Journal of nicholas (3034)

Monday March 17, 2008

05:09 AM

The language is still changing, there is no spec ...

[ #35918 ]

"The language is still changing, there is no spec for the language, there are going to be differences between implementations that are essentially undefined behavior."

The Register has an article about Ruby.NET with a lot of quotes from the project manager, John Lam, such as the one above. However, the spec is not something they can do anything about, so they have no choice. But one that caught my eye was one they do have some choice over:

Some familiar features will not be implemented, however. "Call with current continuation, we're not implementing that. [Although] JRuby isn't either. ...

It makes me ask myself a couple of questions, but not being familiar with Ruby or .NET, I don't know the answer to either. Does my usually silent readership know:

How often is call with current continuation used in typical Ruby programs? Would its absence be noted frequently?
Why do both the .NET and Java VM implementations of Ruby choose to omit it? Are continuations something stonkingly hard to make work well on their VMs? Would such a problem constrain any attempts to make Perl 6 run nicely on the VMs?

List all Journal entries

The language is still changing, there is no spec ... More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

call/cc (Score:1)

by Tony Finch (6392)

Call/cc requires lots of support from the VM, and if the VM isn't designed for it it'll cripple your performance if it isn't completely impossible. To implement call/cc you either need to allocate all stack frames on the heap (which requires an allocator and garbage collector optimised for very high rates of garbage production) or you need to be able to copy the stack when a continuation is captured. While you can implement heap-allocated activation records on the JVM and .net, it's much slower than using t
- Re: (Score:1)
  
  by chromatic (983)
  
  They aren't necessary if you have a decent set of control structures built in to your language.
  
  They aren't necessary if you have the precise set of control structures that you really need built into your language. That's slightly different from what you said.
  As for the Nickclarkulator's second question, Larry's put in a fair bit of work to make sure that it's possible to host a Perl 6 implementation without exposing continuations. Part of that may have been the desire to get Perl 6 running on the Pe
  - Re: (Score:1)
    
    by Aristotle (5147)
    
    Wait, does that mean PerlŠ6 itself does not have continuations?
    - Re: (Score:1)
      
      by chromatic (983)
      
      I think (and Larry's really the one to ask here) that the goal is to support as much of the specification tests as possible without requiring continuations. They're still in the language though.
No "callcc" in Ruby 2.0? (Score:1)

by draegtun (6354)

I believe continuations are being dropped from Ruby 2.0 all together. If so then probably not worth other VM implementations doing it.

http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1801 [lambda-the-ultimate.org]
Web Frameworks (Score:2)

by djberg96 (2603)

How often is call with current continuation used in typical Ruby programs? Would its absence be noted frequently?
In typical Ruby programs? Never. The only serious use I ever saw for them was a continuation based web framework call Borges [rubyforge.org], which was itself based on Seaside.