"Our team has been spearheading the transition from Perl to Python at the facility", says Grant. "There are three primary reasons for this. The creation of Python bindings to a C++ library is very easy and allows us to utilize core R&D libraries in the rest of the pipeline more quickly. The object-oriented nature of Python is very attractive given our new asset model and should allow us to make changes to that asset model much more easily in the future. And, Python is a first-class citizen in many of the third-party software applications that are used in our industry."
from DreamWorks Animation "Shrek the Third": Linux Feeds an Ogre
reverse ('python', 'perl') (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
where are they then? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
perl is like porn? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Blender, Maya and SoftImage all support embedded python scripting, so python probably is a 'standard' in the 3D / film industry.
Re: (Score:1)
As far as I know, there's no "probably" about it. Standardizing on Python (as much as you can standardize on a single language) makes a lot of sense here.
Technology X (Score:1)
'We chose to transition our application from Technology Y to Technology X primary for it's superior meta attribute handling. Technology X has been shown to be better and more effective in programming teams for the standard new model of development. Additionally, most blogs now tout the superior productivity of Technology X programmers, and Technology X application users. "Above all, Technology X provides us with end results that are on average upwards of 50% more shiny than Technology Y given the same pr
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry for my cynical comment here - had a bad coding day today and took the third class citizen thing personally :-)
Ignoring the zealotry... (Score:1)
While I don't know specifics, if their choices came down the raw c, python and say javascript, I'd probably pick Python too.
Re:Ignoring the zealotry… (Score:1)
I’d go for Javascript…
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Really? I was quite delighted to find out how nice it really is when I dove into it in anger a few years ago. To me it feels like a cross of Perl and “something” (which I guess I’d know was Self, if I knew Self), trying to hide behind a C/Java-ish syntax.
At least it has multiline/-statement closures…
Re: (Score:1)
Like they said, accessing their C++ libraries is a lot easier in Python. While I'm not familiar with doing that in Python, I'm sure it can't suck as much as in Perl. Or is there some other reason that there are oftentimes no Perl bindings (or ancient and badly supported) for a particular C/C++ library, whereas there are for Python. Is it just that Python is more popular, or that Python as a language matches up better with C++, and nothing to do with the suckiness of XS?
I wonder myself why they don't use L [wikipedia.org]
Lua? (Score:1)
job at DreamWorks (Score:1)