Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

lilstevey (4628)

lilstevey
  (email not shown publicly)

Consumes:
  • Heinekin
  • Kro
  • Addlestones
  • Old Rosie
  • Thatchers
  • Strongbow
  • Erdinger
  • Guiness
  • Budvar
  • Leffe ( usually blond )
  • Various Real Ales when in premises suitable

Journal of lilstevey (4628)

Thursday February 09, 2006
08:26 AM

Standards & uniformity ( Slashdot )

[ #28634 ]
The distinction between standards and uniformity (#14675560)

" ... What needs to be standardized, then, is not the language per-se, but the rules by which a language is selected. The IF statements. If you read through the standards documents on the IETF's website, you are not looking at a single, all-encompassing rule. You are looking at possibly a few thousand rules, with enough logic behind them to determine which rule applies. ..."

Every so often an insightfull, perhaps even usefull post appears on slashdot. I like the pragmatic approach to the discussion in the article linked to above - the author seems to have an appreciation of the root problem that can get "mis-solved" in language standardisation.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.