The Windows analogue to SSH is Terminal Service.
There are other remote desktop thingys (PcAnywhere, VNC, etc), but they suck in comparison, being slow and flaky. TS is snappy and on a LAN it almost feels like a local computer.
The most annoying thing with TS is that there is no built in way to copy files. I think that's fixed in later versions, but if you're accessing a w2k machine, it's tough if you can't map a network drive because of firewall restrictions.
Enter TSDropCopy:
http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/system/tsdc.htm
Windows SSH (Score:1)
PuTTY [greenend.org.uk] is a FLOSS SSH (including SCP and SFTP) implementation for Windows, with a particularly nice Windows-compatible SSH Agent implementation. (Users moving to Linux desktops keep asking why the SSH-Agent doesn't work as nicely under X-Windows as PAgeant!)
(PuTTY even supports Win32 on Alpha.)
Bill
# I had a sig when sigs were cool
use Sig;
Re:Windows SSH (Score:1)
Re:Windows SSH (Score:1)
SSH rocks because the commandline rocks.
Bill
Bill
# I had a sig when sigs were cool
use Sig;
Ugly solution (Score:1)
TS vs VNC (Score:1)
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000338.html [codinghorror.com]