Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

jjohn (22)

  (email not shown publicly)
AOL IM: taskboy3000 (Add Buddy, Send Message)

Perl hack/Linux buff/OSS junkie.

Journal of jjohn (22)

Thursday December 11, 2003
02:24 PM

the art of blogging

[ #16292 ]

or Me write good someday!

I don't understand blogging. That is to say, I don't understand how some blogs attract a following and others do not. Blogging, or as the old folks used to call it journaling (as in "Yesterday, I was down at Tealicious Teas journaling some rage when the baristas announced that the steamer had crapped out."), is at best amateur journalism and at worst random words interspersed with hyperlinks. Blogging even gets co-opted into hawking political candidates. So what is attractive about blogs? Why are so many of them and how many people are really reading them?

This first question is easy enough to answer. Anyone who was watched the smile of unbridled joy creep across the face of a toddler screaming full bore on a crowded airplane should have some insight into the psychic benefits of blogging. Without restraint, without mediation, and frequently without spell checking, millions of internet users can burp out the smallest of ideas in a forum accessible to the most of the planet at the speed of e-business. Finally, the information-starved citizens of Samarkand, Transoxiana can get the 4-1-1 on which peaches work best in pies and why Wal-Mart sucks. Unfortunately every road as a few potholes, even the Information Superhighway. In fact, the very concept of blogging has its critics, even among those those that write blogging software.

So, blogging is perhaps the rawest form of publication possible, barring mechanical telepathy or do-it-yourself TV stations. The barrier is too low to prevent otherwise quiet people from casting their electronic messages in bottles into the World Wide Webby sea. But then why are other people, who may or may not themselves be blogging, reading these missives? Almost by definition, blogs are humble, unedited things. They are compositions that were blitted out to screen with as little bureaucracy as possible. Most journals appear to be something akin to a Tourettes episode involving a keyboard. How can blogs compete for eyeballs in a world filled with many intelligent, thoughtful, professionally editted articles?

The difference between a crank and a critic is that a critic gets paid. However, cranks are often a lot more fun to observe. They have a train-wreck quality whose enormous gravitational pull will not be denied. Few media are better suited for cranks than blogs. If it is not for the objective reportage, then it must be for the genuinely human stories that blogs are consumed. It must be the mispellings; the incomprehensible rants; the utterly obscure trivia; the prosiac reviews of Smokin' Joe's BBQ; the date with the new guy that went way south; the bike trips; the road trips; the vacation to Tragikstan; the crappiest days at work; the greatest days at work; the last days of work; the birth of little Peter; the passing of Grandma; the blubbery blancmange of evidence; the "secret" Chocolate Crinkle Cookies; the photos of Tallinn; photos of Japan; the photos of me; the photos of you.

I don't know what makes for a popular blog and I'm unlikely to invest the time necessary to solve that mystery. Blogs are simply the graffiti our times. In an increasingly isolated world, it is nice to know that that you aren't the only crank with a computer.

For those angling to hone their bloginating skills, I do have a word of advice comes on the heels of this bit of compositional wisdom from Rabbitblog:

«The critic who says you shouldn't write in run-on sentences and shouldn't use clichés? That critic you can kill.»

While I admire the freedom expressed this guideline, I would suggest using some restraint in allowing run-on sentences to proliferate in your blog. So risking absurdity, I end this journal with this blogging rule of thumb:

Run-on sentences, like profanity, should be used strategically, since it is the exuberant overuse of these oft-maligned parts of speech that mightly tax the reader's attention and damage your ability to drive home the fucking point.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • that feeds the 'reality TV' dreck. I usually only read blogs of people I know or who somehow make their own content instead of just joining in on the linktastic circle jerk that is most of the popular blogs. There are too many blogs, too many bad blogs, and people will get tired of scanning 100 or more blogs when one quick skim of popdex is enough. Also as more people lose their jobs and get sued by spewing words in public it'll jump the shark and people will sit on the couch and gaze at their navel instead

    • And speaking about that, I'm noticing that "jumping the shark" is jumping the shard, as an expression.
      • Forgive me for expounding upon a typo, but...

        Jumping The Shard: Defined as the point in a creative person's life where they begin producing output that is no longer of the high quality it once was. References "The Dark Crystal", where Jim Henson 'jumped the shard'. Also references "Jumping the shark", in which an entire production company or group of actors does this simultaneously. In use: "It's widely believed by many that Chris Carter jumped the shard with Millenium."

        Ah, new and entirely imaginar


        You are what you think.